Scanning Myths |
Myths About Slide Scanning and Negative Scanning: I Will Scan It Myself; it will be cheaperOften, doing something yourself can be less expensive than hiring someone else to do the work for you. We believe that scanning prints, slides and negatives is one case where hiring the work out makes financial sense. Let's look at the real costs of a scanning project.
If you have a relatively small number of slides or negatives to scan (say less than 1000) then the costs of the scanner and other materials will exceed the cost of having Pixmonix do the work for you (even ignoring the value of your time). If you have a large collection of images to scan, the value of your time is the determining factor. If you place any value on your time or if you want the overall scanning project to be done in days rather than weeks or months, then hiring out the scanning work makes sense. Let's do the math:
In this example, using a service like Pixmonix is clearly less expensive. This analysis holds even when we ignore some of the costs detailed above - most critically, the value of your time and any software tools that you might need to purchase. The conclusion is the same if you have a larger number of slides to scan. In this second example, we have suggested that you would buy a more expensive scanner and slide feeder for the effort. This additional up-front expense will greatly reduce the amount of time required and the frustration that you experience on the project. Alternatively, you could buy a less expensive scanner such as the Nikon V and spend more of your time on the project. If we place any value on your time, the overall cost of doing the work yourself will be similar.
Once again, in this example, the difference in cost is about $200, with Pixmonix being less expensive, even when we ignore the value of the time it will require to do the scanning work. Scanning 2000 slides on a single scanner with a single computer for scanning and processing will take a long time. You should plan on this work taking from several dozen to many hundreds of hours, depending on the speed of your computer, the photo editing software that you have available, and your skill level with both scanning and photo editing software. If we estimate that your time is worth $7.25 per hour (the Federal minimum wage) and that you can produce between 5-25 scans per hour then this time doing the scanning may have a cost of $580-$2900. Your time is probably worth more than minimum wage! The difference in cost is $810-$3130, with Pixmonix being less expensive. Using Pixmonix instead of doing the scanning work yourself is starting to look very smart! A similar analysis works for negative films. For negatives, however, the extra expense for the slide feeder included in the second example (approximately $500) is not required. This lowers the do-it-yourself cost. However, scanning negatives is very time consuming - even more than slides. Additionally, the post-scan processing for negatives tends to be more difficult (requiring more skill and more time). Again, if your time is valued, this makes using Pixmonix a less expensive alternative. If you are scanning at 2000 PPI, as we recommend for many of our customers, the cost to do your scanning at Pixmonix is even lower. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
